DECISION SUPPORT MODEL IN PROJECTS OF COMPLEX OBJECTS PROTECTION POTENTIAL DANGER

Authors

  • Роман Юрійович СУКАЧ Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Юрій Павлович РАК Lviv State University of Life Safety, Lviv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2016.1174.22

Keywords:

complex object model, objects of potential danger, risk, fuzzy logic, uncertainty, security, emergency, facility

Abstract

The article made the simulation of complex technical-organizational systems under conditions of risk, uncertainty and the impact of the turbulence and the model of decision support to assess the safety and operation of complex object level based on fuzzy logic and considered the possibility of using the foundations of fuzzy logic, support decisions taken in the draft protection of objects of potential danger. It was established that the definition of conjunction and disjunction as «max», and «min», respectively, gives great opportunities to minimize the model, and found that when simplified models, there is an opportunity to come to the point where some units "reduced", that is, some nodes are made to the model at the design stage have no impact on the success of the project of protection of objects of potential danger. Proved that the problem to be solved within the framework for building complex object models in design-oriented project management protection facilities need to use the potential danger disjunction and conjunction formally presented in the form of algebraic product and the amount of fuzzy sets, as this does not lead to the loss of nodes and provides conditions that take into account the impact of all input parameters. Considered in terms of advantages and disadvantages of the use of logical operations, as well as the characteristics and properties of the object of potential hazards, to minimize the number of key relationships in the model for optimal project management in assessing and improving the safety of life.

References

Getman V. V.,&Buravlov E. P. (2014). Texnogenna bezpeka Ukrayiny`: vid reaguvannya do preventy`vnoyi strategiyi [Technogenic security Ukraine: from response to preventive strategies]. Kyiv: Logos, 130 [in Ukrainian].

Alymov V. T., &Tarasova N. P. (2014). Tehnogennyj risk. Analiz i ocenka [Technological risks. Analysis and evaluation]. Moscow: Akademkniga [in Russian].

Сasti J. (2002). Bol'shie sistemy. Svjazannost', slozhnost' i katastrofy [Connectivity complexity, and catastrophe in large-scale systems] Moscow: World [in Russian].

Belov P. G. (2003). Sistemnyj analiz i modelirovanie opasnyh processov v tekhnosfere [Systems analysis and Modeling hazardous processes in the technosphere] Moscow: Akademia [in Russian].

Ministry of Ukraine of Emergencies, Ministry of Economy, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (2007). On approval of the Methodology predict the consequences of the spout (release) of hazardous chemicals in accidents at industrial facilities and transport. zakon3.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved fromhttp://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0326-01.

Bushuev S. D., Bushueva N. S.,&Yaroshenko R. F. (2012). Model garmonizacii cennostej programmy razvitiya organizacij v usloviyah turbulentnosti okruzheniya [Model of harmonize values development program organizations in the turbulent environment]. Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 10, 9–13 [in Ukrainian].

Bushueva N. S.,& Bushuev S. D. (2007). Proaktivnoe upravlenie proektami organizacionnogo razvitija v uslovijah neopredeljonnosti [Proactive management of projects organizational development in conditions of uncertainty]. Journal of East Ukrainian National University named after Volodymyr Dahl, 22, 17–27 [inRussian].

Ageev A. E. (2006). Organizacionnaja model' upravlenija riskami proektov[The organizational model of risk management projects]. Radio electronic and computer systems, 3, 41–44 [inRussian].

Al-Shukri Ahmed Fathi Mohammed (2003). Analiz istochnikov i faktorov izmenenij v proektah stroitel'stva slozhnyh jenergeticheskih ob’ektov [Analysis of the sources and drivers of change in the construction of complex energy facilities]. Scientific works project management and production development, 3 (8), 64–69 [in Russian].

Rach V. A. (2013). “Nebezpeka/rizik/kriza” yak trіadna sutnіst procesіv rozvitku v suchasnіj ekonomіcі ["The danger /risk/ crisis" as the essence of a process of development processes in the modern economy]. Journal of East Ukrainian National University named after Volodymyr Dahl, 1 (45), 155–160 [in Ukrainian].

Rudenko S. V., HohunskyyV.D.,ChernenkoY.S. (2013). A multidimensional model of the target of the risk function in life safety projects [Mnogomernaja model' celevoj funkcii riska v proektah bezopasnosti zhiznedejatil'nosti]. Safety of human life - education, science, practice: XII international scientific - practical conference. (pp. 203–206) [in Russian].

Tesla Y. M.,&Kubyavka L. B. (2014). Koncepcіja pobudovi ta funkcії sistemi u proti rizikovogo upravlіnnja proektami u programah іnformacіі [The concept of the construction and function of the system against risk in project management programs information]. Proceedings of management of complex systems. Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 19, 93–95 [in Ukrainian].

Druzhinin E. A. (2006). Metodologichni osnovy` ry`zy`k-oriyentovanogo pidxodu do upravlinnya resursamy` proektiv i program rozvy`tku texniky` [Methodological basis of a risk-based approach to resource management projects and programs of technology]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kharkov: National AerospaceUniversityZhukovsky [in Ukrainian].

Kononenko, I. V. (2012). Optimizacija soderzhannja proekta po kriterіjam pribyl', vremja, stoimost', kachestvo, riski [Optimization of the project content by kriterіyam profit, time, cost, quality, risk]. Vostochno-evropeiskyi zhurnal peredovykh tekhnolohyiEast European Journal of advanced technologies, 1/10 (55), 13–15 [inRussian].

Published

2016-03-01

Issue

Section

Сборник научных статей