RESEARCH ABSORBING STATES OF THE SYSTEM USING MARKOV CHAINS AND FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX

Authors

  • Тетяна Мефодіївна ОЛЕХ Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Віктор Дмитрович ГОГУНСЬКИЙ Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Юлія Сергіївна БАРЧАНОВА Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine
  • Катерина Миколаївна ДМИТРЕНКО Odesa National Polytechnic University, Odesa, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2016.1174.4

Keywords:

model of success criteria, Markov‘s chains, absorbing state of the system, the canonical form, the fundamental matrix

Abstract

The article discusses the use Markov chains to research models that reflect the essential properties of systems, including methods of measuring the parameters of projects and assess their effectiveness. In the study carried out by its decomposition system for certain discrete state and create a diagram of transitions between these states. Specificity displays various objects Markov homogeneous chains with discrete states and discrete time determined by the method of calculation of transition probabilities. A model of success criteria for absorbing state system that is universal for all projects. A breakdown of passages to the matrix submatrices. The variation elements under matrix Q n with growth linked to the definition of important quantitative characteristics of absorbing circuits: 1) the probability of achieving the status of absorbing any given; 2) the mean number of steps needed to achieve the absorbing state; 3) the mean time that the system spends in each state to hit irreversible system in absorbing state. Built fundamental matrix that allowed calculating the different characteristics of the system. Considered fundamental matrix for supposedly modeled absorbing Markov chain, which gives the forecast for the behavior of the system in the future regardless of the absolute value of the time elapsed from the starting point. This property illustrates the fundamental matrix Markov process that characterizes it as a process without aftereffect.

References

Yaroshenko F., Bushuyev S., & Tanaka H., (2012). Management of innovative projects and programs on the basis of knowledge P2M. Kyiv: Summit Book, 272.

Gogunsky V. D., & Rudenko S. V. (2008). Basic laws of project management. Project Management: Status and Prospects: Fourth international conference. Mykolaiv: NUS, 37-40.

Kolesnіkova K. V. (2014). Development of project management theory: justification for initiating project law. Management of development of complex systems, 17, 24-31. doi.org10.13140/RG.2.1.3669.4487.

Teslenko P. A., & Gogunsky, V. D. (2010). Evolutionary Paradigm of Project Management. Project Management: Status and Prospects. Sixth international conference. Mykolaiv: NUS, 114-117.

Bushuyev S. D., & Bushueva N. S. (2010). Mechanisms of value in the work of project-driven organizations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/2 (43), 4-9.

Beloschitsky A. A. (2012). Vector method of goal-setting projects in design-vector space. Management of development of complex systems, 11, 110-114.

Vaysman V. O., Velichko S. O., & Gogunsky V. D. (2011). System of standards for enterprise knowledge management in project-driven organizations. Odes. Polytechnic University. Pratsi, 1 (35), 257-262.

Kolesnikova E. V., Kostrova G. V., & Prokopovich I. V. (2007). Methods of assessing the quality of technical systems. Odes. Polytechnic University. Pratsi, 1 (27), 128-130.

Vaysman V. A., Lukianov D. V., & Kolesnikova K. V. (2012). The planar graphs closed cycles determination method. Odes. Polytechnic University. Pratsi, 1 (38), 222-227. doi.org10.13140/RG.2.1.1880.9687.

Rudenko S. V., Kolesnikova E. V., & Bondar V. I. (2012). Network project management processes in the context of project status display. Problems technology, 4, 61-67.

Olekh T. M., Oborskaya A. G., & Kolesnikova E. V. (2012). Methods of evaluation of projects and programs. Odes. Polytechnic University. Pratsi, 2 (39), 213-220. doi.org10.13140/RG.2.1.2080.2005.

Olekh T. M., Gogunsky V. D., & Rudenko S. V. (2013). Evaluation of environmental projects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/10 (61), 79-82. doi.org10.13140/RG.2.1.2885.3209.

Olekh T. M., Gogunsky V. D., & Tkachuk S. V. (2014). Multidimensional evaluation of projects via Markov models. Evolutionary Paradigm of Project Management. Project Management: Status and Prospects. Tenth international conference. Mykolaiv: NUS, 196-199.

Kemeny J., & Snell J. (1970). Finite Markov Chain. Moscow: Nauka, 129.

Vaysman V. A., Gogunsky V. D., & Tonkonogy V. M. (2012). Methodological fundamentals of quality management: factors, parameters, measurement, evaluation. Modern technologies in engineering, 7, 160-165.

Published

2016-02-29

Issue

Section

Сборник научных статей