DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2020.2.9

HYPERDYNAMIC PROJECTS MANAGEMENT FEATURES

Ігор Михайлович Флис

Abstract


The role and place of projects in various arears of social and industrial activity, the life cycle of which is measured by several days or hours, have been analyzed. An example of such specific projects are the solution of tasks in the field of national security and defense (combat operations in the armed conflicts, full-fledged military operations), liquidation of emergencies consequences (large-scale forest fires, floods, tsunamis, man-made disasters), as well as in other industries (in agricultural and construction industries, at transport). Such specific projects have all their characteristic attributes: time and resources limited unique one-off process. The role and importance of specific projects, the implementation duration of which is measured by several days or hours in general classification, have been identified. It is proposed to classified specific projects according to their life cycle into four groups: long-term, lasting from one to several years, short-term, lasting from one month to one year, dynamic, lasting from several days to one month, and hyper dynamic, lasting from several hours to one-three days. The features of hyper dynamic projects managing have been analyzed and its main principles have been formulated: task definition and unambiguous understanding of the task (industrial, operational-tactical, combat), its full awareness by all executors at all project phases; efficiency and perfection of all preparatory work (all-round project providing with all necessary means and resources) and the active phase of hyper dynamic project (fire damage of the enemy, firefighting, accident or  disaster consequences liquidation, harvesting on tight agro-technical terms, goods transportation, engineer networks repairing, etc.); high level of proficiency and highest level of willful responsibility for the fulfillment of their regular duties during the work (operational-tactical, combat, industrial)  of hyper dynamic project performers at all levels of the superstructure; professional training and moral support of hyper dynamic project performers purposefulness and discipline in the process of its realization, despite the active influence of risks, the main ones being the probable threats to health and life; control system clarity and continuity in the process of hyper dynamic project implementation, which is ensured, first of all, by maintaining the stable operation of communication systems, their duplication or multiplicity; identification of potential risks, reaction and tracking in the course of hyper dynamic project executing, especially in the case of highly probable threats to the performers health and life; continuous monitoring of the execution of all stages of  hyper dynamic project, instant decision making and prompt adjustments corrective (orders and commands submission to the subordinates in the hierarchical construction by communication means). The next stage of our research, we consider, is substantiation of the projects duration classification and doing the intensity analysis of the consumption of allocated (planned) resources for their implementation.

Keywords


hyper dynamic project; project management; project life cycle; project duration; project intensity; project management principles

References


Tkachuk P. P. Rozvytok ozbroyennya raketnyh vij’sk i artylerii Zbrojnyh Syl Ukrainy z vrahuvannyam dosvidu iih zastosuvannya v antyterorystychnij operatcii na shodi Ukrainy [Development of armament of missile troops and artillery of the Ukraine Armed Forces account into the experience of their use in the antiterrorist operation in eastern Ukraine] Zbirnyk tez dopovidei mizhnar. nauk.-tekhn. konf. (17-18 travnya 2018 roku). – Perspektyvy rozvytku ozbroyennya ta vijs’kovoi tekhniky suhoputnyh vijs’k[Theses digest of the International scientific and technical conference (L’viv, May 17-18, 2018). – Prospects of the weapons and military equipment development of the field forces]. L’viv: NAFF, 2018, pp. 178-179.

Flys I., Sviderok S. Project approach to activity management of the land artillery unit in a combined battle. Open Access Peer-reviewed Journal. Science Review. 2018, Vol. 3., 6 (13), рp.10-14. doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_sr/01072018/5920.

Taylor F. The Principles of Scientific Management. 1911.

Forsberg K., Mooz H., Gotterman H. Visualizing Project Management. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2005., pp. 340-360.

Armstrong М. Menegment: metody і pryjomy [Management: methods and methods]. Кyiv, Znanja-pres, 2006. 876 p.

Turner R. Guide to project-based management. Moskow, Grebennikov Publishing House, 2007. 552 p.

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK guide). Sixth Edition. USA : PMI Inc. 537 p.

ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management. ISO PC 236, no. 113. 51 p.

IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline (IPMA OCB). IPMA, 2013. 67 p. doi. org/10.1108/ijmpb-10-2013-0049.

Bushuyev S. D., Bushuyev D. A., Jaroshenko R. F. Organization Development Project Management Driving by Entrepreneurship Energy. Serbian Project Management Journal. 2016, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 12-16.

Bushuyev S. D. Jaroshenko R. F., Tanaka X. Upravleniye innovatcionnymi projektami i programmami na osnove sistemy znanii Р2М: monografiya [Management of innovative projects and programs based on the P2M knowledge system: Monograph]. Кyiv, «Sammit-Knyga», 2012. 272 p.

Bushuyev S. D., Bushuyev D. A., Jaroshenko R. F. Proryvni kompetentcii v upravlinni innovatcijnymy proektamy ta programamy [Plosive competences in the innovative projects and programs management]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI". Ser.: Strategichne upravlinnya, upravlinnya portfelyamy, programamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management]. Kharkiv, NTU « KhPI », 2018, no. 1 (1277), pp. 3-9.

Kononenko I. V., Lutsenko S. Yu. Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on project management. Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management. Kharkiv, NTU «KhPI», 2018, no. 1 (1277), pp.10-17.

Gogunskii V .D., Rudenko S. V. Osnovnyje zakony proektnogo menedgmenta [The basic project management laws]. Upravlinnya proektamy: stan ta perspektyvy [Project Management: Status and Prospects]. Mykolaiv, NUK, 2008, pp. 37-40.

Rybak A. I. Analiz elementov motivatcii i delegirovaniya vlastnykh polnomochij v srede proektnoj deyatel’nosti [Analysis of the elements of motivation and authority delegation in the project activities environment]. Naukovi zapysky Mizhnarodnogo gumanitarnogo universytetu: Zbirnyk [International Humanitarian University scientific notes: Digest]. Odesa, Mizhnar. gumanit. un-t, 2008, iss. 11, pp. 4-13.

Chernov S. K., Koshkin K. V. Kontceptual’nye osnovy razvitiya naukojomkih predpriyatij v konkurentnoj srede [Conceptual bases of high-tech enterprises development in the competitive environment]. Vostochno-Evropejskij zurnal peredovyh tekhnologij [Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies]. 2012, 1/2 (43), pp. 20-22.

Teslia Yu., Khlevnyi A., Khlevna I. Control of informational Impacts on project management. Proceedings of the 1th IEEE International Conference on Data Stream Mining & Processing. L’viv, Ukraine, 2016, pp. 387-391.

Chumachenko I. V., Guseva Yu. Yu., Sydorenko M. V. Upravlinnya zatcikavlenymy storonamy osvitnih proektiv [Managing stakeholders in educational projects]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI". Ser.: Strategichne upravlinnya, upravlinnya portfelyamy, programamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management]. Kharkiv, NTU « KhPI », 2016, no. 2 (1174), pp.8-12.

Danchenko O. B., Leps’kyj V. V. Modeli strategichnogo menedgmentu medychnyh proektiv proektno-oriyentovanogo medychnogo zakladu [Models of medical projects strategic management at the project-oriented medical institution]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI". Ser.: Strategichne upravlinnya, upravlinnya portfelyamy, programamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management]. Kharkiv, NTU « KhPI », 2018, no. 2 (1278), pp.45-52.

Sydorchuk O. V., Pukas V. L., Lub P. M., Sharybura A. O. Strukturnyi analiz proektiv tekhnologichnykh system zbyrannya vrozhayu [Structural analysis of harvesting technological systems projects]. Visnyk NTU "KhPI". Ser.: Strategichne upravlinnya, upravlinnya portfelyamy, programamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management]. Kharkiv, NTU «KhPI», 2018, no. 2 (1278), pp.10-14.

Flys I. Scientific and practical aspects for production and reprocessing complexes. Commission motorization and power industry in agriculture. Lublin, 2011, Vol. XI, pp. 83-91.

Flys I. Scientific and methodological problems in management of innovative projects creation in production and reprocessing complexes. An International Journal On Operation on Farm and Agri-Food Industry Machinery. Rzeszow, 2012, Vol. 14, No 5, pp. 57-61.


GOST Style Citations


1.   Ткачук П. П. Розвиток озброєння ракетних військ і артилерії Збройних Сил України з врахуванням досвіду їх застосування в антитерористичній операції на сході України. Матеріали міжнародного науково-практичного семінару кафедри наземної артилерії Національної академії сухопутних військ ім. гетьмана Петра Сагайдачного 20.12.2018 р. Львів : НАСВ, 2018. С. 178-179.

 

2.   Flys I., Sviderok S. Project approach to activity management of the land artillery unit in a combined battle. Open Access Peer-reviewed Journal. Science Review. 2018. 6(13), Vol.3. Р.10-14. doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_sr/01072018/5920.

 

3.   Taylor F. The Principles of Scientific Management. 1911.

 

4.   Forsberg K., Mooz H., Gotterman H. Visualizing Project Management. 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2005. P. 340-360.

 

5.   Армстронг М. Менеджмент: методи і прийоми. Київ : Знання-прес, 2006. 876 с.

 

6.   Turner R. Guide to project-based management. Moskow : Grebennikov Publishing House, 2007. 552 p.

 

7.   A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK guide). Sixth Edition. USA : PMI Inc. 537 p.

 

8.   ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management. ISO PC 236, № 113. 51 p.

 

9.   IPMA Organisational Competence Baseline (IPMA OCB). IPMA, 2013. 67 p. doi. org/10.1108/ijmpb-10-2013-0049.

 

10. Bushuyev S. D., Bushuyev D. A., Jaroshenko R. F. Organization Development Project Management Driving by Entrepreneurship Energy. Serbian Project Management Journal. 2016. Vol. 6, iss. 2. P. 12-16. 

 

11. Танака Х., Бушуев С. Д., Ярошенко Ф. А. Управление инновационными проєктами и программами на основе системы знаний Р2М : [Монография]. Київ : «Саммит-Книга», 2012. 272 с.

 

12. Бушуєв С. Д., Бушуєв Д. А., Ярошенко Р. Ф. Проривні компетенції в управлінні інноваційними проєктами та програмами. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проектами. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2018. № 1 (1277). С. 3-9.

 

13. Kononenko I. V., Lutsenko S. Yu. Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on project management. Bulletin of the Technical University “KhPI”. Series: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2018. №1 (1277). С.10-17.

 

14. Гогунский В. Д., Руденко С. В. Основные законы проєктного менеджмента. Управління проєктами: стан та перспективи: матеріали міжнар. наук.-техн. конф. Миколаїв : НУК, 2008. С. 37-40.

 

15. Рибак А. И. Анализ элементов мотивации и делегирования властных полномочий в среде проєктной деятельности. Наукові записки Міжнародного гуманітарного університету: Збірник. Одеса : Міжнародн. гуманіт. ун-т, 2008. Вип. 11. Серія : Управління проєктами та програмами. С. 4-13.

 

16. Чернов С. К., Кошкин К. В. Концептуальные основы развития наукоемких предприятий в конкурентной среде. Восточно-Европейский журнал передовых технологий. 2012. 1/2(43). С. 20-22.

 

17. Teslia Yu., Khlevnyi A., Khlevna I. Control of informational Impacts on project management. Proceedings of the 1th IEEE International Conference on Data Stream Mining & Processing. Lviv, Ukraine, 2016. P. 387-391.

 

18. Чумаченко І. В., Гусєва Ю. Ю., Сидоренко М. В. Управління зацікавленими сторонами освітніх проєктів. Вісник НТУ «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проєктами. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2016. № 2 (1174). С. 8-12.

 

19. Данченко О. Б.,  Лепський В. В. Моделі стратегічного менеджменту медичних проєктів проєктно-орієнтованого медичного закладу. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проєктами. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2018. №2 (1278). С. 45-52.

 

20. Сидорчук О. В., Пукас В. Л., Луб П. М., Шарибура А. О. Структурний аналіз проєктів технологічних систем збирання врожаю. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проєктами. Харків : НТУ «ХПІ», 2018. № 2 (1278). С. 10-14.

 

21. Flys I. Scientific and practical aspects for production and reprocessing complexe. Commission motorization and power industry in agriculture. Lublin, 2011. Vol. XI. P. 83-91.

 

22. Flys I. Scientific and methodological problems in management of innovative projects creation in production and reprocessing complexes. MOTROL. Commission Motorization and Energetics in Agriculture. An International Journal On Operation on Farm and Agri-Food Industry Machinery. Rzeszow, 2012. Vol. 14, No 5. P. 57-61.






Copyright (c) 2020 Ігор Михайлович Флис

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Strategic Management Department, NTU «KhPI»
All rights reserved © 2015-2020 Kharkiv, Ukraine