PROJECT TEAM MANAGEMENT MODEL UNDER RISK CONDITIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2023.7.1Keywords:
project; risk; project team; sprint; project tasks; frameworAbstract
The paper examines the state of the problem of the influence of risks on the project team's work process. The processes of the team's work during the
implementation of the project sprint are defined. The authors identified risk factors that affect the effectiveness of the project team. An analysis of
modern approaches was carried out and three directions were identified, which represent the research of project team management processes under
conditions of risk. A comprehensive reference model of project team management under risk conditions is proposed in the form of a framework. It
reflects the interrelationship of four models: the project team behavior model, the model for assessing the quality of the formation of sprint tasks, the
model for determining the distribution of tasks in the project team, and the model for the formation of recommendations. The project team evaluates
the text description of the task, obtained from the information system, using the sprint task formation quality assessment model. Natural language
processing methods are used to create a model for evaluating the quality of forming sprint tasks, which combine the method of processing text
information and the method of learning based on precedents, which allows taking into account the previous experience of the team and its behavior.
The project team behavior model allows taking into account the risks of irrational work organization during the sprint. The behavior of the project
team is analyzed using Process Mining methods. The case representation model allows the project team to store and reuse knowledge and experience
based on simulation modeling and reinforcement learning approaches. It allows the team to determine and evaluate possible options for the distribution
of tasks and resources in the team in accordance with the reduction of possible risks. The central element of the proposed framework is the model of
recommendations used in decision-making. It provides the project team with the necessary information for effective decision-making in terms of risks
in project management. The proposed framework provides an opportunity to reduce the impact of the risks of non-fulfillment of project tasks during
the sprint. Further studies of the task of managing the project team under conditions of risk should be directed to the development of specified models
of the proposed framework
References
Agile software development manifesto [Electronic resource]. Access mode: https://agilemanifesto.org/iso/uk/manifesto.html
The Scrum Guide. The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game. Available at: http://www.scrumguides.org/
Włodzimierz Wysocki, Cezary Orłowski. A multi-agent model for planning hybrid software processes. Procedia Computer Science., 2019, Vol. 159, P. 1688-1697. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.339
Włodzimierz Wysocki. A hybrid software processes management support model. Procedia Computer Science, 2020, Vol. 176, P. 2312-2321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.291
Cezary Orłowski, Irena Bach-Dąbrowska, Paweł Kapłański, Włodzimierz Wysocki. Hybrid Fuzzy-ontological Project Framework of a Team Work Simulation System. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, Vol. 35, P. 1175-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.214
Shu-Chien Hsu, Kai-Wei Weng etc. Understanding the complexity of project team member selection through agent-based modeling. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, Vol.e 34, Issue 1, P.82-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.001
Xiaocong Fan, JohnYen. Modeling and simulating human teamwork behaviors using intelligent agents. Physics of Life Reviews, 2004, Vol. 1, Issue 3, P. 173-201. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2004.10.001
Hai Zhuge. Workflow- and agent-based cognitive flow management for distributed team Cooperation. Information & Management, 2003, Vol. 40, Issue 5, P. 419-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00061-7
Menezes, J., Gusmão, C. & Moura, H. Risk factors in software development projects: a systematic literature review. Software Qual
J 27, 2019, P. 1149–1174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-018-9427-5
Kolychev Vladimir, Bezmenskii Nikita. Estimation of the tasks complexity for large-scale high-tech projects using Agile methodologies. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, Vol. 145, P. 266-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.057
Eric Weflen, Cameron A. MacKenzie, Iris V.Rivero. An influence diagram approach to automating lead time estimation in Agile Kanban project management. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, Vol. 187, 115866. Р. 1-12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115866
Shariq Aziz Butt, Ayesha Khalid, Tuncay Ercan etc. A software-based cost estimation technique in scrum using a developer's expertise. Advances in Engineering Software, 2022, Vol. 171, 103159, Р. 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103159
Gouthaman P, Suresh Sankaranarayanan. Prediction of Risk Percentage in Software Projects by Training Machine Learning Classifiers. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2021, Vol. 94, 107362, Р. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107362
Michal Košinár, Radoslav Štrba. Simulations of Agile Software Processes for Healthcare Information Systems Development Based on Machine Learning Methods. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2013, Vol. 46, Issue 28, Pages 175-180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3182/20130925-3-CZ-3023.00028
Han, WM. Validating differential relationships between risk categories and project performance as perceived by managers. Empir Software Eng 19, 1956–1966 (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-013-9270-z
Sundararajan. S., Marath, B. & K. Vijayaraghavan, P. Variation of risk profile across software life cycle in IS outsourcing. Software Qual J 27, 1563–1582 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-019-09451-8
Marinho, M., Sampaio, S. & Moura, H. Managing uncertainty in software projects. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 14, 2018, P. 157–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-017-0297-y
Masood Uzzafer. A simulation model for strategic management process of software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 2013, Vol. 86, Issue 1, P. 21-37. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.042.
Adel R., Harb H. and Elshenawy A. A Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Risk Management Model for Distributed Agile Software Projects. 2021 Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS), 2021, pp. 512-520, DOI: 10.1109/ICICIS52592.2021.9694252.
Taye, G.D., Feleke, Y.A. Prediction of failures in the project management knowledge areas using a machine learning approach for software companies. SN Appl. Sci. 4, 165 (2022). 2523-3971 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05051-7
Daming Li, Lianbing Deng, Xi Zeng, Zhiming Cai. Dynamic simulation modelling of software requirements change management system. Microprocessors and Microsystems. Vol. 83, 2021, P. 1-6.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104009
Soreangsey Kiva, Samedi Hengb, Yves Wauteletc, Stephan Poelmansc, Manuel Kolp Using an ontology for systematic practice adoption in agile methods. Expert system and practitioners-based validation, 2022, Vol. 195, 116520. Р. 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116520
Moskalenko V., Fonta N., Grinchenko M. The Method of Forming a Dynamic Projects Portfolio of IT Companies: The 1st International Workshop IT Project Management (ITPM 2020), Ukraine, February 18-20, 2020, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), Vol. 1. Lviv, volume 2565. online. P. 152-161.
Aalst, van der, W. M. P., Adriansyah, A., Alves De Medeiros (2012). Process mining manifesto. In F. Daniel, K. Barkaoui, & S. Dustdar (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2011 International Workshops, Clermont-Ferrand, France, August 29, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, Part I) (pp. 169-194). Vol. 99.
Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19.
Henning Wachsmuth. Text Analysis Pipelines Towards Ad-hoc Large-Scale Text Mining. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015, р. 302.
Richard S. Sutton and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Second edition. Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press, 2018. Р. 525.
Yagnesh G., Vishal P. A Survey on Various Techniques of Recommendation System in Web Mining. International Journal of Engineering Development and Research. 2015 IJEDR. Volume 3 рр. 696-700.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold the copyright without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-commercial and non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
