TOWARDS HYBRID CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE QUALITY ASSESSMENT MODEL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2025.11.4

Keywords:

cloud infrastructure quality assessment, expert judgment, entropy-based assessment, hybrid assessment model, quality criteria, cloud service quality metrics, decision making

Abstract

The paper presents a hybrid model for the cloud infrastructure quality assessment, which combines subjective expert assessments with objective results of statistical analysis. The proposed model, called Hybrid Expert-derived with Entropy-based Weighted Sum Model (HEE-WSM), combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine weights based on expert assessments and the entropy-based approach to calculate weights using real data. The proposed HEE-WSM model is a novel approach that takes into account both expert judgments and cloud environment monitoring data. Eight criteria (such as availability, reliability, latency, scalability, performance efficiency, cost, security compliance, and support responsiveness) based on the international standards NIST SP 800-145 and ISO/IEC 25010 are proposed for the cloud infrastructure quality assessment. These criteria are divided into “benefit” and “cost” criteria, which is necessary to ensure normalization and proper comparison of different quality metrics. A hybrid mechanism for determining weighting coefficients allows balancing the weighting coefficients determined on the basis of AHP and the entropy approach using an adjustable coefficient that provides flexibility depending on decision-making needs. Thus, the flexibility of the proposed model is ensured by the ability to adjust the influence of subjective and objective weights of criteria. The final quality assessment is performed using the Weighted Sum Model that aggregates normalized quality metric scores for each alternative. To demonstrate the robustness of the proposed approach, ten leading cloud providers were analyzed in this study, including Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Alibaba Cloud, and several others. The obtained results demonstrated that the proposed model allows for effective evaluation of cloud services, with GCP receiving the highest total quality score. The proposed approach can be considered an adaptive, transparent, and useful tool for implementation in decision support systems for cloud infrastructure management. The proposed model can be applied in organizations and enterprises for the informed selection of cloud service providers. Future research includes the integration of real-time data monitoring and the application of machine learning methods for automatic adjustment of quality criteria weights.

References

Basu A., Ghosh S., Dutta S. An innovative approach of selecting cloud provider through service level agreements. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2024. Available at : https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJBIS.2024.142190. (accessed 10.03.2025).

Xiao F., Fan W., Han L., Qiu T. Joint Service Deployment and Task Offloading for Datacenters with Edge Heterogeneous Servers. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025. Available at : https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10874186. (accessed 10.03.2025).

García-Ayllón S., Pilz J. Territorial spatial evolution process and its ecological resilience. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2025. Available at : https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1601067/full. (accessed 11.03.2025).

Hosseinzadeh M., Hama H. K., Ghafour M. Y. Service selection using multi-criteria decision making: a comprehensive overview. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 2020. Available at : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10922-020-09553-w. (accessed 11.03.2025).

Mahesar A. R., Li X., Sajnani D. K. Enhancing task scheduling and QoS optimization in mobile edge computing via microservice-oriented container selection. Computing, 2025. Available at : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00607-024-01410-x. (accessed 16.03.2025).

Krisnawijaya N. N. K. Architectural design of data management and analytics platforms for smart farming. Wageningen University Research, 2025. Available at : https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/architectural-design-of-data-management-and-analytics-platforms-f. (accessed 22.03.2025).

Mostafa A. M. An MCDM approach for cloud computing service selection based on best-only method. IEEE Access, 2021. Available at : https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9622259. (accessed 22.03.2025).

Nadeem F. A unified framework for user-preferred multi-level ranking of cloud computing services based on usability and quality of service evaluation. IEEE Access, 2020. Available at : https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9208735. (accessed 27.03.2025).

Gireesha O., Somu N., Krithivasan K., VS S. S. IIVIFS-WASPAS: an integrated multi-criteria decision-making perspective for cloud service provider selection. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020. Available at : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X19307307. (accessed 27.03.2025).

Tomar A., Kumar R. R., Gupta I. Decision making for cloud service selection: a novel and hybrid MCDM approach. Cluster Computing, 2023. Available at : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10586-022-03793-y. (accessed 08.04.2025).

Saha M., Panda S. K., Panigrahi S., Taniar D. An efficient composite cloud service model using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of Supercomputing, 2023. Available at : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11227-022-05013-1. (accessed 13.04.2025).

Mell P., Grance T. The NIST definition of cloud computing (Special Publication 800-145). National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2011. Available at : https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-145.pdf. (accessed 13.04.2025).

International Organization for Standardization. (2011). ISO/IEC 25010:2011 – Systems and software engineering – Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. Available at : https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html. (accessed 15.04.2025).

Saaty T. L. Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008. Available at : https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590. (accessed 15.04.2025).

Mandal N., Sarkar P., Petrović N. Multi-criteria decision-making for ranking renewable energy sources: A case study from the Republic of Serbia. Journal of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, 2025. Available at : https://library.acadlore.com/JEMSE/2025/4/2/JEMSE_04.02_03.pdf. (accessed 15.04.2025).

Amazon Web Services. Available at : https://aws.amazon.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Microsoft Azure. Available at : https://azure.microsoft.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Google Cloud Platform. Available at : https://cloud.google.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

IBM Cloud. Available at : https://www.ibm.com/cloud. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. Available at : https://www.oracle.com/cloud. (accessed 18.04.2025).

DigitalOcean. Available at : https://www.digitalocean.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Alibaba Cloud. Available at : https://www.alibabacloud.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Linode (now part of Akamai). Available at : https://www.linode.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Vultr. Available at : https://www.vultr.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Hetzner Online. Available at : https://www.hetzner.com. (accessed 18.04.2025).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-17