HYBRID MODELING METHODOLOGY FOR PREDICTING RISKS IN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2026.12.3Keywords:
Emergency situations, hybrid modeling, risk prediction, Monte Carlo method, Weibull distribution, fire safetyAbstract
This research addresses the critical challenge of forecasting natural and man-made emergency situations, with a specific focus on industrial and forest fire dynamics. Traditional emergency management often relies on deterministic models that, while physically accurate, struggle to incorporate the inherent stochasticity of environmental variables. Conversely, purely statistical approaches frequently fail to account for unique, non-linear scenarios where historical data is insufficient. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a robust hybrid modeling methodology that integrates fundamental physico-mathematical equations with advanced probability theory methods. The core of the deterministic component is based on the parabolic partial differential equation of heat conduction, which describes the thermal evolution of objects under stress. To account for real-world uncertainties, environmental parameters such as wind speed and ambient temperature are treated as random variables, modeled using Weibull and Gaussian distributions respectively. A comprehensive computational experiment was conducted using the Monte Carlo simulation method, executed via Python-based algorithms to perform 10,000 iterations for dynamic fire risk assessment. The Finite Difference Method (FDM) was employed to solve the heat transfer equations iteratively. The results indicate that while a static deterministic model predicts a failure time of 24.5 minutes, the hybrid approach reveals a significant stochastic variance, with failure times ranging from 15 to 45 minutes. Notably, the model identified a "Tail Risk" where 5% of the simulations resulted in failure within less than 18 minutes—a critical safety window that traditional models overlook. Furthermore, a counter-intuitive physical correlation was observed where higher wind speeds occasionally delayed failure due to enhanced convective cooling effects. This methodology provides a more realistic and granular tool for decision-makers in emergency management, offering not just a single risk value but a comprehensive probability interval essential for life-saving evacuation planning.
References
Carta, J. A., Ramirez, P., & Velazquez, S. (2009). A review of wind speed probability distributions used in wind energy analysis: Case studies in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5), 933-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.02.005
Cozzani, V., Gubinelli, G., Antonioni, G., Spadoni, G., & Zanelli, S. (2005). The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 127(1-3), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.003
Cozzani, V., Campedel, M., Renni, E., & Krausmann, E. (2010). Industrial accidents triggered by flood events: Analysis of past accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 175(1-3), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.042
Drysdale, D. (2011). An Introduction to Fire Dynamics (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119975465
MES of Republic of Azerbaijan (2023). Statistics and Analysis of disasters. Baku. https://fhn.gov.az/en/statistics/statistical-data
Hurley, M. J., Gottuk, D. T., Hall Jr, J. R., Harada, K., Kuligowski, E. D., Puchovsky, M.,... & Wieczorek, C. (Eds.). (2015). SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (5th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0
Khan, F., Hashemi, S. J., Paltrinieri, N., Amyotte, P., Cozzani, V., & Reniers, G. (2016). Dynamic risk management: a contemporary approach to process safety management. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 14, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2016.07.002
Krausmann, E., Cruz, A. M., & Salzano, E. (2017). Natech Risk Assessment and Management: Reducing the Risk of Natural-Hazard Impact on Hazardous Installations. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803807-9.00001-3
Naderpour, M., Rizeei, H. M., Khakzad, N., & Pradhan, B. (2019). Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 191, 106558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106558
Paltrinieri, N., & Khan, F. (2020). Dynamic Risk Analysis in the Chemical and Petroleum Industry: Evolution and Interaction with Parallel Disciplines in the Perspective of Industrial Application. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811965-5.00001-0
Pedroni, N., & Zio, E. (2017). Uncertainty quantification in risk assessment of industrial systems. Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies, 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10216-9
Reniers, G., & Cozzani, V. (Eds.). (2013). Domino Effects in the Process Industries: Modeling, Prevention and Managing. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54323-3.00001-1
Ricci, F., Scarponi, G. E., Pastor, E., Planas, E., & Cozzani, V. (2021). Safety distances for storage tanks to prevent fire damage in Wildland-Industrial Interface. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 147, 693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.022
Ricci, F., Casson Moreno, V., & Cozzani, V. (2023). Natech accidents triggered by heat waves. Safety, 9(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9020033
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D.,... & SciPy 1.0 Contributors. (2020). SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods, 17(3), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Zio, E. (2013). The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4588-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold the copyright without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-commercial and non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.