RISK FORECASTING IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EXTERNAL FACTORS AFFECTING IT PROJECTS UNDER A FIXED BUDGET

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2026.12.9

Keywords:

project management, risk forecasting, fixed-budget projects, outsourcing, IT projects, risk modeling, resource planning

Abstract

The study investigates project management methods and risk forecasting in fixed-budget IT outsourcing projects considering the nonlinear dynamics of the external environment. An integrated approach is proposed, combining traditional project management practices with modern risk forecasting techniques, including statistical models, time series analysis, and simulation methods. The research models the impact of market fluctuations, technological uncertainty, and regulatory changes on key project indicators, such as timelines, costs, and final product quality. Results demonstrate that risk forecasting enhances budget and resource planning accuracy, reduces the probability of schedule overruns, and ensures stability in project execution. The proposed methodology encompasses risk identification, quantitative assessment of probability and impact, and adaptation of the project management plan to environmental changes. Modeling outcomes define decision-making priorities and optimal response strategies to unforeseen factors. Practical implementation of this approach allows organizations to increase the efficiency of fixed-budget IT outsourcing projects, minimize financial losses, and improve product quality under variable market conditions. The study also outlines directions for future research, including the application of machine learning and big data to enhance risk forecasting accuracy and automate project management processes.

References

Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Hoboken: Wiley, 2017. 832 p.

Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute, 2021. 370 p.

Tomanek M., Juricek J. Project risk management model based on PRINCE2 and Scrum frameworks. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications. 2015. Vol. 6, no. 1. P. 81–88. doi: 10.5121/ijsea.2015.6107

Taleb N. N. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House, 2010. 444 p.

Williams T., Ackermann F., Eden C. Structuring complex projects: A framework for addressing uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management. 2010. Vol. 28, no. 8. P. 749–761. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.003

Hillson D., Simon P. Practical Project Risk Management: The ATOM Methodology. Vienna: Management Concepts, 2012. 256 p.

Svejvig P., Andersen P. Hybrid project management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management. 2021. Vol. 39, no. 2. P. 144–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.10.003

Morozov V., Deineha V., Yeremenko D. Development of energy consumption prediction models based on gradient descent methods. IEEE 5th International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST). Astana, Kazakhstan, 2025. doi: 10.1109/SIST61657.2025.11139299

Serrador P. The impact of agile and hybrid project management approaches on project success. Project Management Journal. 2022. Vol. 53, no. 2. P. 158–172. doi: 10.1177/87569728211043502

Vose D. Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide. Chichester: Wiley, 2008. 752 p.

Kulyk R., Morozov V., Liakhovych H. Hybrid Risk Analysis Models: Integration of Machine Learning and Heuristic Methods. IEEE IDAACS 2025: XIII International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications. Gliwice, Poland, 4–6 Sep. 2025. Gliwice: Silesian University of Technology, 2025. URL: https://www.idaacs.net/storage/conferences/10/WTP/IDAACS_2025_Technical%20Programme_zoom_%28final%29.pdf.

Chapman C., Ward S. How to Manage Project Opportunity and Risk. Hoboken: Wiley, 2011. 392 p.

Ясинецький О. О., Фесенко Т. Г. Управління ризиками ІТ-проєктів: аналітичний огляд досліджень. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проєктами. 2025. № 1 (10). С. 47–57. URL: https://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/handle/KhPI-Press/95600.

Strielkina A., Tetskyi A., Krasilshchykova V. Risk and uncertainty assessment in software project management: integrating decision trees and Monte Carlo modeling. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems. 2023. No. 3. P. 217–225. doi: 10.32620/reks.2023.3.17

Aaltonen K., Kujala J. Towards an improved understanding of stakeholder dynamics. International Journal of Project Management. 2016. Vol. 34, no. 8. P. 1537–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009

Гомозов Є., Мац В. Mathematical models of IT business risks assessment. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Стратегічне управління, управління портфелями, програмами та проєктами. 2024. № 1 (8). URL: https://pm.khpi.edu.ua/article/view/306780.

Leshchuk H. V. Simulyatsiynyi analiz Monte Carlo v systemi otsiniuvannia ryzykiv investytsiinykh proektiv. Ukrainskyi zhurnal prykladnoi ekonomiky. 2017. Vol. 2, no. 1. P. 57–67.

Boehm B., Turner R. Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2004. 336 p.

Hastie S., Wojewoda S. Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report – Q&A with Jennifer Lynch. InfoQ. 2015. Vol. 32, no. 4. P. 8–15. URL: https://www.infoq.com/articles/standish-chaos-2015/

Meyer W. G. Quantifying risk: measuring the invisible: conference paper. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, 2015. 25 p.

Published

2026-05-31